FREEDOM
OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
| In the Matter of a Complaint by | FINAL DECISION | ||
| Misty Williams and Dawn Massey, | |||
| Complainants | |||
| against | Docket #FIC 2004-542 | ||
| Respondent | November 9, 2005 | ||
The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on June 2, 2005, at which time the complainant and the respondent appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint. For purposes of hearing, this matter was consolidated with Docket #FIC 2004-543, Misty Williams and Dawn Massey v. John Opie, First Selectman, Town of Branford; and Docket #FIC 2004-567; Misty Williams and Dawn Massey v. John Opie, First Selectman, Town of Branford. At the hearing in this matter, Dawn Massey, requested, and was granted, party status, with the assent of all original parties. The case caption has been amended accordingly.
After consideration of the entire record, the following facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:
1. The respondent is a public agency within the meaning of §1-200(1), G.S.
2. It is found that, by letter dated November 3, 2004, the complainants requested that the respondent provide them with a certified copy of the record regarding the 2003 Grand List residential property assessment appeal file for property located at 1114 Main Street.
3. It is found that, by letter dated November 9, 2004, the respondent acknowledged receipt of the request described in paragraph 2, above, and informed the complainants that he would search for the record described in paragraph 2, above.
4. It is found that, by letter dated November 17, 2004, the complainants amended their request, as described in paragraph 2, above, in order to describe the 1114 Main Street property as “commercial” rather than “residential”.
5. By letter dated November 29, 2004, and filed with the Commission on December 1, 2004, the complainants alleged that the respondent violated the Freedom of Information Act by denying them a certified copy of the record described in paragraphs 2 and 4, above. The complainants requested the imposition of a civil penalty against the respondent.
6. On May 24, 2005, the respondent moved to impose a civil penalty against the complainants.
7. Section 1-210(a), G.S., provides in relevant part:
[e]xcept as otherwise provided by any federal law or state statute, all records maintained or kept on file by any public agency, whether or not such records are required by any law or by any rule or regulation, shall be public records and every person shall have the right to…receive a copy of such records in accordance with section 1-212….
8. Section 1-212(a), G.S., provides in relevant part: “[a]ny person applying in writing shall receive, promptly upon request, a plain or certified copy of any public record.”
9. It is found that respondent does not keep on file or maintain the record described in paragraphs 2 and 4, above, within the meaning of §1-210(a), G.S. It is further found that such record never existed.
10. It is concluded that the respondent did not violate §§1-210(a) and 1-212(a), G.S., as alleged in the complaint.
11. The Commission declines to consider imposing a civil penalty against the complainants at this time.
The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint.
1. The complaint is hereby dismissed.
Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of November 9, 2005.
________________________________
Petrea A. Jones
Acting Clerk of the Commission
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:
Town of Branford
c/o Elizabeth P. Gilson, Esq.
383 Orange Street
New Haven, CT 06511
___________________________________
Petrea A. Jones
Acting Clerk of the Commission
FIC/2004-542FD/paj/11/14/2005