FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

 

            The above-captioned matter was scheduled to be heard as a contested case on August 16, 2005 at 9:30 A.M., at which time the respondent appeared, but the complainants did not appear to prosecute the case.    This matter was then continued to September 20, 2005 at 11:00 A.M., at which time the respondent again appeared, but the complainants again did not appear to prosecute the case.   

           

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

 

1.  The complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

 

2.  The complainants are admonished for their failure to appear at the hearings in this matter, which failure resulted in a waste of scarce state and municipal resources. 

 

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of October 26, 2005.

 

________________________________

Petrea A. Jones

Acting Clerk of the Commission

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

Anthony Lazzari and

Kimberly Lazzari

87 High Street

Naugatuck, CT 06770

 

Chief, Police Department,

City of Waterbury

c/o Gary S. Roosa, Esq.

City of Waterbury, Police Department

255 East Main Street

Waterbury, CT 06702-2389

 

 

___________________________________

Petrea A. Jones

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

 

FIC/2005-207FD/paj/10/31/2005