FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

In the Matter of a Complaint by

FINAL DECISION

Susan G. Kniep,

 

Complainant

 

 

against

Docket #FIC 2000-589

Superintendent of Schools,
East Hartford Public Schools,

 

 

Respondent

April 11, 2001

 

 

 

 

The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on November 30, 2000, at which time the complainant and the respondent appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.

After consideration of the entire record, the following facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:

1.  The respondent is a public agency within the meaning of §1-200(1), G.S.

 

2.      It is found that on October 20, 2000, and again on October 23, 2000, the complainant submitted a request to the respondent for copies of any and all applications submitted by Gary LeBeau that were on file with East Hartford Board of Education and documentation reflecting how Mr. LeBeau’s listing of “sex” as a hobby was addressed by the administration and/or board of education upon the hiring of Mr. LeBeau (hereinafter “the requested records”).

 

3.      It is found that by letter dated October 24, 2000, the respondent informed the complainant that “we do not comment on personnel matters.”

 

4.      By e-mail dated and filed on October 30, 2000,  the complainant appealed to this Commission alleging that the respondent violated the Freedom of Information (“FOI”) Act by failing to provide her with the requested records.

 

5.      Section 1-210(a), G.S., provides in relevant part that:

 

[e]xcept as otherwise provided by any federal law or state statute, all records maintained or kept on file by any public agency, whether or not such records are required by any law or by any rule or regulation, shall be public records and every person shall have the right . . . to receive a copy of such records in accordance with the provisions of section 1-212. 

 

6.      Section 1-212(a), G.S., provides in relevant part that “[a]ny person applying in writing shall receive, promptly upon request, a plain or certified copy of any public record . . . .”

 

7.      It is found that the requested records are public records within the meaning of §1-210(a), G.S.

 

8.      At the hearing on this matter, the complainant informed this Commission that on October 26, 2000, the respondent provided her with a copy of an application of Mr. LeBeau dated July 29, 1978, which contains a reference to sex as a hobby, but that she had not received any documentation regarding how the board of education had addressed  such reference.  The complainant also claimed that the application she received is different from an application that a reporter showed her shortly before she made her request of October 20, 2000.

 

9.    It is found that Mr. LeBeau’s personnel file is maintained in the human resource department of the East Hartford Public Schools and that no other office maintains files pertaining to personnel matters.

 

10.  It is found that upon receiving the complainant’s request, the respondent forwarded the request to the human resource department, which conducted a search for any records responsive to the complainant’s request.

 

11.  It is found that each page of Mr. LeBeau’s personnel file, which dates back to 1973, was reviewed by Mr. Corso of the human resource department and that no other applications were found nor were any documents pertaining to Mr. LeBeau’s hobbies found.

 

12.  It is found that an exhaustive search was conducted and that no other documents responsive to the complainant’s request exist.

 

13.  It is therefore concluded that the respondent did not violate the disclosure provisions of §1-210(a) or §1-212(a), G.S.

 

 

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint.

 

1.      The complaint is hereby dismissed.

 

2.      Although the complaint in this matter is dismissed, the Commission strongly encourages the respondent to, in the future, provide direct and non-elusive responses to records requests.  If the respondent had provided a more direct response in this case, the need for a hearing may have been avoided.

 

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of April 11, 2001.

 

 

_________________________________________

Petrea A. Jones

Acting Clerk of the Commission


PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

Susan G. Kniep

50 Olde Roberts Street

East Hartford, CT 06108

 

Superintendent of Schools

East Hartford Public Schools

c/o Richard A. Mills, Jr., Esq.

Shipman & Goodwin

One American Row

Hartford, CT 06103-2819

 

 

 

________________________________

Petrea A. Jones

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

FIC/2000-589/FD/paj/04/12/2001