FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

In the Matter of a Complaint by

FINAL DECISION

Ford Fessenden and
The New York Times Company,

 

Complainant

 

 

against

Docket #FIC 2000-388

Research Analyst Supervisor,
State of Connecticut, Office of
Health Care Access; and State
of Connecticut, Office of Health
Care Access,

 

 

Respondent

 March 14, 2001

 

 

 

 

The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on September 6, 2000, at which time the complainants and the respondents appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.

After consideration of the entire record, the following facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:

1.  The respondents are public agencies within the meaning of §1-200(1), G.S.

 

2.      By letter dated June 13, 2000, to the respondents, the complainants made a request for “records of hospital admissions for 1991 to 1999, including all fields collected by regulation except those that identify a patient’s name and street address.”

 

3.      It is found that the respondents maintain an “Inpatient Discharge Database” which is the document responsive to the complainants’ request.

 

4.      By letter dated July 5, 2000, the respondent research analyst supervisor informed the complainants that due to the mandates of §19a-167g-94 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, which pertains to the respondent Office of Health Care Access, a copy of the Inpatient Discharge Database could not be released. 

 

5.      By letter dated July 18, 2000 and filed on July 21, 2000, the complainants appealed to this Commission alleging that the respondents violated the Freedom of Information (“FOI”) Act by denying their request.

 

6.      Section 1-210(a), G.S., provides in relevant part that:

 

[e]xcept as otherwise provided by any federal law or state statute, all records maintained or kept on file by any public agency, whether or not such records are required by any law or by any rule or regulation, shall be public records and every person shall have the right . . . to receive a copy of such records in accordance with the provisions of section 1-212. 

 

7.      Section 1-212(a), G.S., provides in relevant part that “[a]ny person applying in writing shall receive, promptly upon request, a plain or certified copy of any public record . . . .”

 

8.      It is found that the requested records are public records within the meaning of §1-210(a), G.S.

 

9.      Section 19a-654, G.S., provides that "[i]ndividual patient and physician data identified by proper name or personal identification code and submitted pursuant to this section shall be kept confidential…"

 

10.  It is therefore concluded that section 19a-654, G.S., exempts from public disclosure personally identifying patient and physician information from the Inpatient Discharge Database.

 

11.  It is further concluded, therefore, that the respondents violated the provisions of §§1-210(a) and 1-212(a), G.S., by failing to provide the complainants with a copy of the Inpatient Discharge Database, with personally identifying patient and physician information redacted.

 

 

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint.

 

1.      The respondents shall forthwith provide the complainants with a copy of Inpatient Discharge Database.

 

2.   In complying with paragraph 1 of the order, above, the respondents may redact any personally identifying patient and physician information from the Inpatient Discharge Database, prior to disclosure to the complainants. 

 

3.   Henceforth, the respondents shall strictly comply with the disclosure provisions of §§1-210(a) and 1-212(a), G.S.

 

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of March 14, 2001.

 

_________________________________________

Petrea A. Jones

Acting Clerk of the Commission


PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

Ford Fessenden and The New York

Times Company

c/o Glory Lena, Esq. and

Ralph G. Elliot, Esq.

Tyler Cooper & Alcorn, LLP

CityPlace - 35th Floor

Hartford, CT 06103-3488

 

Research Analyst Supervisor,

State of Connecticut, Office of

Health Care Access; and State

of Connecticut, Office of Health

Care Access

c/o Thomas J. Ring, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General

55 Elm Street, PO Box 120

Hartford, CT 06141-0120

 

 

________________________________

Petrea A. Jones

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

 

 

FIC/2000-388/FD/paj/03/20/2001