FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION

OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

In the Matter of a Complaint by FINAL DECISION

Joseph Paquette,

Complainant,

against Docket #FIC 89-116

Director of Inspections and Permits, Town of East Hartford,

Respondent October 11, 1989

The above-captioned matter was scheduled for hearing August 28, 1989, at which time the parties appeared and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.

After consideration of the entire record, the following conclusions of fact are found and conclusions of law are reached:

1. The respondent is a public agency within the meaning of §1-18(a), G.S.

2. By letter of complaint dated April 10, 1989, the complainant alleged he had been denied copies of communications and documents pertaining to his property at 260 Prospect Street in East Hartford.

3. It is found that on March 16, 1989, the complainant requested copies of all communications, documents or any other materials, including oral communications that may have been reduced to writing, concerning his property.

4. The respondent claimed that all the requested records had been provided to the complainant.

5. It is found that all the requested records have been provided to the complainant.

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint.

1. The complaint is hereby dismissed.

Docket #FIC 89-116 Page 2

PURSUANT TO 4-180(c) C.G.S. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE F.O.I.C., OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

JOSEPH PAQUETTE

P.O. Box 8231

East Hartford, CT 06108

DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS, TOWN OF EAST HARTFORD

c/o Jose R. Ramirez, Esquire

Corporation Counsel

740 Main Street

East Hartford, CT 06108

Approved by order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of October 11, 1989.

Tina C. Frappier

Acting Clerk of the Commission