FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a Complaint by FINAL
DECISION
Vera S. Zima,
Complainant,
against Docket
#FIC 87-169
Chief of Police, Wallingford Police Department,
Respondent December
9, 1987
The above-captioned
matter was heard as a contested case on July 20, 1987, at which time the
complainant presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint. On September 8, 1987, the respondent
subsequently submitted evidence as ordered by the Commission pursuant to
§1-21j-36 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies.
After consideration of
the entire record, the following facts are found:
1. The respondent is a public agency within the
meaning of §1-18a(a), G.S.
2. By letter dated May 8, 1987, and filed with
the Commission on May 14, 1987, the complainant alleged the respondent failed
to comply with the Commission's order in Docket #FIC 86-229.
3. The order in question states:
"1.
The respondent forthwith shall provide the complainant with copies, at
no cost, of all records of its investigation of the Zima deaths and fire,
specifically including the record referred to at paragraph 5(h), above. Such order shall not include records
regarding the alleged sexual assault of Tracy Zima and pending investigation
thereof.
2.
The respondent forthwith shall act in strict compliance with the
requirements of §§1-15 and 1-19(a), G.S., regarding prompt access to inspect or
receive copies of public records.
Docket #FIC 87-169 Page 2
3.
The respondent forthwith shall provide the complainant with access to
tape recordings of telephone calls received at the Wallingford police
department between 2:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. on March 28, 1986. The respondent may determine how best to
comply with this paragraph of the order.
4. In
complying with paragraph three of the order, above, the respondent may delete
information which is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information
Act."
4. The respondent claims he provided the
complainant with copies of all records of the Wallingford Police Department's
investigation of the Zima deaths and fire, (except the records of the alleged
sexual assault of Tracey Zima) at no cost, in accordance with paragraph 1 of
the Commission's order in Docket #FIC 86-229.
5. The respondent also claims the police
department made a tape recording of the telephone calls it received between
2:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. on March 28, 1986 in accordance with paragraph 3 of the
Commission's order in Docket #FIC 86-229, and offered the tape recording to the
complainant but she refused to accept it.
6. It is noted that on July 28, 1987, the
Commission, pursuant to §1-21j-36 of the Regulations of Connecticut State
Agencies, ordered the respondent to submit additional sworn testimony
indicating whether or not he had complied with paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of the
Commission's order in Docket #FIC 87-229.
7. It is found that on September 8, 1987, the
respondent submitted to the Commission an affidavit of a police department
detective stating he had enclosed copies of the following records:
a. A
receipt signed by the complainant on May 12, 1987 indicating she had accepted
copies of the records of the police department's investigation of the Zima
deaths and fire.
b. A
tape cassette of the tape recording described in paragraph 5, above.
Docket #FIC 87-169 Page 3
8. Based upon the evidence presented, it is
concluded the respondent has complied with the Commission's order in Docket
#FIC 86-229.
The
following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the
above-captioned complaint:
1. The complaint is hereby dismissed.
Approved
by order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its special meeting of
December 9, 1987.
Catherine
H. Lynch
Acting
Clerk of the Commission