FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF
CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of
a Complaint by FINAL
DECISION
M. A. Antar,
Complainant
against Docket #FIC 86-287
First Selectman
and Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Bethany,
Respondents February 25, 1987
The above-captioned matter was heard
as a contested case on December 9, 1986, at which time the complainant and the
respondents appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony,
exhibits and argument on the complaint.
After consideration of the entire
matter, the following facts are found:
1. The
respondents are public agencies within the meaning of 1-18a(a), G.S.
2. By
letter of complaint filed with the Commission on October 10, 1986 the
complainant alleged he had been denied access to public records.
3. It
is found that at meetings held March 10, 1986 and April 14, 1986 the respondent
board considered a variance application submitted by George Scarveles.
4. By
letter to the respondent first selectman dated September 19, 1986 the
complainant made a request for certain documents relating to Mr. Scarveles's
variance application.
5. By
letter to the respondent first selectman dated October 5, 1986 the complainant
stated he had not yet received the following documents:
a. A copy of the application;
b. A copy of a January 3, 1986 letter signed by
Gerald Dwyer, town counsel;
c. Minutes of a March 10, 1986 meeting of the
respondent board, including the record of votes and the minutes of the
"executive" session; and
Docket #FIC
86-287 Page Two
d. Minutes of an April 14, 1986 meeting of the
respondent board, including the record of votes and minutes of the
"executive" session.
6. The
complainant further alleged that the records of the respondent board were not
kept at the town hall, but in the home of its secretary, Mr. Carrone.
7. Subsequent
to the filing of his complaint the complainant made requests of the Bethany
planning and zoning commission (P&ZC) for certain documents. The respondent board and the P&ZC,
however, are two different town agencies whose documents are maintained
separately. Such later requests,
therefore, are not encompassed by the original complaint and will not be
considered in this report.
8. The
complainant claims that in providing a copy of Mr. Scarveles's application the
respondent board improperly omitted the final page.
9. It
is found that requests for variances are filed on a printed, four-page form,
the back page of which is not used. It
is concluded that the respondent board's response to the complainant's request
for a copy of Mr. Scarveles's application did not violate 1-15, G.S. The Commission notes that the failure to
provide a copy of such final page upon specific request would violate
1-15, G.S.
10. It
is found that the respondent board has in its files a January 3, 1986 letter
from Gerald Dwyer, a copy of which was requested by the complainant. On October 2, 1986 the complainant was given
a copy of Mr. Dwyer's unsigned file copy.
11. It
is found that the respondent board's failure to provide the complainant with a
copy of Mr. Dwyer's letter as it appears in the respondent board's files
violated 1-15, G.S.
12. It
is found that the respondent board did not exclude the public from any portion
of either its March 10, 1986 or its April 14, 1986 meetings. The term "executive session" was
used to designate the deliberative portions of the meetings. The respondent board indicated at hearing
that it has discontinued such use of the term "executive session."
13. It
is concluded that the failure to produce separate minutes of the portions of
the March 10, 1986 and April 14, 1986 meetings designated "executive
sessions" did not violate 1-19(a) or 1-21(a), G.S.
Docket #FIC
86-287 Page
Three
14. The
complainant claims he has not been provided with signed, approved minutes of
the March 10, 1986 or April 14, 1986 meetings of the respondent board and that
the minutes he was given did not contain a record of the votes taken.
15. It
is found that the alleged failure to sign or approve minutes does not violate
any provision of the Freedom of Information Act. However, the failure to include in the minutes of the meetings in
question a record of the votes taken violated 1-19(a) and 1-21(a),
G.S.
16. It
is found that the respondent board has no office at town hall. All records of the respondent board are kept
at the home of the board's secretary.
17. The
respondent board claims that it keeps its records in the home of its secretary
because adequate protection against loss or alteration is not available at the
town hall, where only the town clerk and one other employee are available to
safeguard records. The respondent board
further claims that it has been willing to meet with the complainant for the
purpose of allowing access to inspect original documents.
18. It
is found that 1-19(a), G.S. requires each public agency which has no
regular office or place of business to keep and maintain all public records in
the office of the clerk of the political subdivision in which such agency is
located.
19. It
is concluded that keeping the records of the respondent board at the home of
its secretary violates the requirements of 1-19(a), G.S. regarding the
keeping of public records.
20. It
is also concluded that keeping the records of the respondent board at the home
of its secretary denied the complainant's right to inspect public records, in
violation of 1-19(a), G.S.
The following order by the
Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the
above-captioned complaint.
1. The
respondent board shall forthwith transfer its records from the custody of its
secretary in his home to the custody of the town clerk at the Bethany town hall
and shall henceforth keep and maintain all of its public records in the office
of the Bethany town clerk.
Docket #FIC
86-287 Page Four
2. The
respondent board shall forthwith provide the complainant with copies of minutes
of its March 10, 1986 and April 14, 1986 meetings, including a record of the
votes taken at such meetings.
3. The
respondent board shall forthwith provide the complainant with a copy of the
January 3, 1986 letter signed by Gerald Dwyer, referred to in paragraphs 5(b)
and 10, above.
Approved by order of the Freedom of
Information Commission at its regular meeting of February 25, 1987.
ÿ
Karen J.
Haggett
Clerk of the Commission